{"id":1014,"date":"2013-06-26T17:54:08","date_gmt":"2013-06-27T00:54:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.constructonomics.com\/blog\/?p=1014"},"modified":"2019-10-02T11:18:22","modified_gmt":"2019-10-02T18:18:22","slug":"a-few-thoughts-on-the-philadelphia-building-collapse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/constructonomics.com\/blog\/2013\/06\/26\/a-few-thoughts-on-the-philadelphia-building-collapse\/","title":{"rendered":"A Few Thoughts On The Philadelphia Building Collapse"},"content":{"rendered":"
The building that collapsed at 22nd and Market Street in Philadelphia is nothing less than a tragedy. But now that the dust has quite literally settled, it’s time to pick up the Like any construction failure I’ve heard of, the details are kept very hush hush and coming to a conclusion about what exactly happened or who to blame is darn near impossible. For a lot of reasons, the construction process involves several parties, from designers, to contractors, to city officials. Everybody gets a chance to hold the hot potato, so in the grand scheme of things, everybody shares a little bit of the responsibility. When things like this happen, everybody has a finger pointed\u00a0in their face while they are pointing a finger at somebody else.<\/span><\/p>\n
pieces and figure out what went wrong. However, it’s just not an easy thing to do. By the way, I kind of feel like Nostradamus by writing a post about Intra-Industry Ethics<\/a> a month before this happened.<\/span><\/p>\n