{"id":182,"date":"2010-01-21T21:17:57","date_gmt":"2010-01-22T04:17:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.constructonomics.com\/blog\/?p=182"},"modified":"2010-04-17T18:39:45","modified_gmt":"2010-04-18T01:39:45","slug":"construction-companies-lightly-represented-in-fortunes-top-100-companies-to-work-for","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/constructonomics.com\/blog\/2010\/01\/21\/construction-companies-lightly-represented-in-fortunes-top-100-companies-to-work-for\/","title":{"rendered":"Construction companies lightly represented in Fortune’s Top 100 Companies to Work For"},"content":{"rendered":"

I’ve always been rather suspicious of rankings that were put out by magazines like Fortune or the Princeton Review for companies or schools or whatever, however they always make for some interesting reading and in the very least some lively conversati\"dpr_construction__bctwf\"ons.\u00a0 Fortune magazine came out with their 100 Best Companies to Work For<\/a> today and while the construction industry is represented, we certainly didn’t top the list.<\/p>\n

Denver based PCL Construction Enterprises led the construction industry field at number 31.\u00a0 I worked for a competitor of PCL in Colorado for a few years, and while our nickname for them was “Pour now Chip Later”, I think this derogatory reference was just a result of resentment for their strong presence throughout Colorado.\u00a0 Fortune describes their reasoning for PCL making the list as follows:<\/p>\n

General contractor offers unique benefits: unlimited paid sick time (for employees or their ill children and spouses), a $200 reimbursement for employee enrollment in an exercise plan or health club membership, company-paid life insurance up to four times salary, and stock ownership for all salaried employees.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I’ve known a few people people who have worked for PCL and from what I hear, I can’t argue too much with the ranking, I’ve heard that they give three weeks vacation to start, which is utterly unheard of in the construction industry.\u00a0 I would venture a guess that working for PCL is a pretty good bet.<\/p>\n

At number 57 is California based DPR Construction.\u00a0 DPR also ranked just above Goldman Sachs at 20 in the Big Pay list with an average pay for superintendents of $122,600.\u00a0 Fortune had this to say about DPR:<\/p>\n

This Bay Area-based general contractor really likes to toast special occasions like new projects, company awards, anniversaries (the firm marks its 20th birthday this year) — it has wine bars installed in all of its 17 offices.<\/p>\n

Employees of the firm, which builds facilities for companies such as Google, Qualcomm and Herman Miller, are in a celebratory mood, despite the lousy construction market. “In these economic times, they pay some employee salaries even though there is no project for them,” says one. “This is unheard of in the construction industry.” On a scale of 1 to 10, the toughest rating any employee gave DPR in a recent staff survey was 9.5.<\/p>\n

Another reason for staffers to cheer: On top of the firm’s solid pay and benefits package, nearly a third receive so-called “phantom stock.” Last year, as 2003 shares vested, 362 employees were paid out $3.4 million, or about $9,400 each.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Also making the list was Balfour Beatty Construction at number 76 and Gilbane at number 92.<\/p>\n

It’s always hard to make lists like this because individuals are very different and all may excel in different situations.\u00a0 However, it is very pleasant for our minds to be provided with rankings and such in an effort to make some sense of our world.\u00a0 Plus, it’s quite fun.<\/p>\n

I’m personally a fan of smaller growing companies where more responsibility and flexibility would be given to employees, so I doubt I’m going to be sending my resume to PCL or DPR anytime soon.\u00a0 Plus, I highly doubt they’re hiring.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I’ve always been rather suspicious of rankings that were put out by magazines like Fortune or the Princeton Review for companies or schools or whatever, however they always make for some interesting reading and in the very least some lively conversations.\u00a0 Fortune magazine came out with their 100 Best Companies to Work For<\/a> today […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3,4,5],"class_list":["post-182","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-construction-blog","tag-construction-economics","tag-john-poole"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/constructonomics.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/constructonomics.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/constructonomics.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/constructonomics.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/constructonomics.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/constructonomics.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":325,"href":"https:\/\/constructonomics.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182\/revisions\/325"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/constructonomics.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/constructonomics.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/constructonomics.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}